[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Friday, July 14, 2006

Detroit Area Newspaper Letters about the MCRI

In today's Detroit News Jennifer Gratz addresses the theme of the effect of the MCRI on women's rights.

Friday, July 14, 2006


Letter

Re-establishing equal rights won't hurt women


Since Michigan AFL-CIO President Mark Gaffney is married to One United Michigan's executive director, it's not surprising that he spews the same myths of those opposing the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative ("Definition of fairness at issue in fall affirmative action vote," June 16). The initiative cannot and will not hurt girls' sports programs, breast cancer screening centers, and domestic violence shelters.

Lying about MCRI is the only way the opposition can scare voters into ignoring the actual issue -- racial preferences. If people read the ballot language, MCRI will easily pass.

We can look to the two states that have already passed the initiative -- California and Washington -- and see women's programs have not collapsed. A simple reading of the proposal confirms MCRI won't eliminate "all affirmative action programs"; it will only eliminate granting preferential treatment based on race or sex in public contracting, employment and education.

Gaffney asks fathers to reflect on equality between our sons and daughters. I ask mothers and fathers alike to consider if we want our daughters to receive preferential treatment while our sons are discriminated against. Gaffney must have a low opinion of women if he believes we cannot be successful without extra help from the government.

Michigan voters are smart enough to filter the brazen lies and vote yes for fairness and equality.

Jennifer Gratz

Executive Director

Michigan Civil Rights

Initiative

Lansing

I would like to ask Mr. Gaffney to tell us the name of the last woman to head the AFL-CIO. HIS union's executive dining room, like that of the UAW, seems to only have the good of the gander on its menu. Jack Lifton, July 14, 2006

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home