[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Monday, July 24, 2006

Empowerment, not Affirmative Action, is the Future

Why am I posting the article below? The answer is that it tells a story that American private enterprise doesn't want to hear: Affirmative action in America has caused billions upon billions of dollars to be wasted setting up and maintaining private enterprises that are simply "fronts" designed to generate numbers for minority content levels mandated by federal and state regulations and set-asides.

I ask that the American OEM automotive industry-at least, what's left of it-tell us how many new jobs for American minority group members have been created by all of the supplier diversity programs since the beginning of their participation in the development of minority business enterprises?

I ask further for them to tell us how much profit for the minority business enterprises has been generated by their supplier diversity programs, and I ask the minority business enterprises to tell us the salaries of their executives, individually and identify them by race.

Why don't large European and Asian companies make investments here in the USA in minority business enterprises on the scale of the one discussed in the article below?

Read the commitments below that a French company is making to the indigenous people of the Republic of South Africa and ask yourself just how effective American affirmative action has been?


Lafarge signs R1,1bn empowerment deal, creates new company
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

French construction materials group Lafarge has signed a R1,1-billion broad-based socioeconomic empowerment deal that has resulted in the creation of Sinako, a broad-based new generation and women-led company.

The stakeholders of Sinako, which means “we can” in Xhosa, are Motjoli, a black-owned and -managed company, with a 20% stake, Peotona, a majority black-women-owned company also with a 20% stake and two broad-based trusts.

The education trust consists of a 53% stake, while the community trust has a 7% stake in Sinako.

Sinako will own shares in Lafarge mining and industrial.

Speaking at a media briefing held in Sandton, Johannesburg, on Friday, Lafarge CEO Frederic de Rougemont said while many regarded such a transaction as a hurdle, he saw it as an opportunity to introduce an element of diversity that would result in innovative creations.

He said that one of the objectives in structuring the transaction was the inclusion of community involvement, especially in the rural areas.

“We have about 23 communities along the quarries and we see at least two to three of these communities taking a stake in Sinako,” he said, adding that a number of communities had already shown an interest in becoming stakeholders.

Rougemont pointed out that the Education Trust would benefit the visually impaired and HDSAs from marginalised communities, with a particular emphasis on women.

Further, Lafarge’s HDSA employees will acquire an interest of about R275-million in the company’s operations.

Rougemont has pointed out that as skills development was important, the Education Trust, which consists of a majority share in Sinako, would provide support as well as funds.

He added that a R10-million dividend, which will be issued in the first year, would focus on skills development, especially for women and the visually impaired.

According to Rougemont, determining suitable partners meant that candidates were measured against criteria including integrity, reputation, business credentials, experience and the ability to add value.

Speaking at the ceremony, Motjoli CEO Nonkqubela Mazwai said that as BEE partners they would be actively involved in the commercial functioning of Lafarge by rendering meaning contributions to the committees to which they belonged.

She added that Motjoli, a mining exploration and development company, with focus in the coal and diamond sector would benefit extensively from the transaction as it would complement its asset base.

According to Peotona head and 29%-shareholder Cheryl Carolus, the acquisition provides her company with an opportunity to capitalise on strong growth prospects resulting in the building and infrastructure development boom.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home