[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Ward Connerly forces black parents to send their children to the Ivy League!

Some personal thoughts and observations:

Here is a link,http://www.diversityinc.com/public/21884print.cfm,to an article published today on the web site Diversityinc.com blaming Ward Connerly for, among other things, being responsible for black parents in California sending their children to ivy league schools where the atmosphere for people of color is better than in the University of California system, they say, since California voters passed Proposition 209 forbidding the use of race based quotas in state funded institutions.

The article concludes that this very outcome could be the fate of Michigan students if the MCRI passes.

When I was 18, in 1958, a friend in my graduating class at Cass Technical High School in Detroit was told by a Harvard recruiter that the private ivy league school had already filled its "quota for Jews" for the class of 1962, so he would be well advised to apply to the publicly funded University of Michigan. He did, was accepted, and went on to U of M's law school, and to a distinguished career.

I sometimes wonder if time passes at all for the supporters of BAMN and OUM?

The article linked above by the way talks about the decline in minority enrollment in the California university system since the passage of 209. Nowhere does it mention the drop out rate of minorities from Los Angeles' high schools, or the astounding percentage of Asian-Americans admitted to the University of California's world famous Berkeley campus.

Perhaps all of these issues should be brought out into the open, before the parents of the minorities who can have sent all of their children to eastern private schools leaving no source of future leadership at all for Californians of color.

Would quotas have made any difference in the collapsing public school system of California's largest city?

Would they make any difference to Detroit's abominable school system?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home