[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Friday, August 25, 2006

Epitaph: Minority Content in the American OEM Automotive Industry

Epitaph: Minority Content in the American OEM Auto Industry

General Motors chief of purchasing, Bo Andersson, recently admitted that GM did not meet its minority content “target” for 2005. He further stated that such targets would no longer be set, because they are not realistic anymore. GM has clearly abandoned its knee-jerk adherence to affirmative action in selecting—or outright creating—suppliers from the American black community.

It is our prediction that, when MCRI passes, GM will say it was “forced” to abandon its programs. This is simply not true. GM is bailing out of affirmative action in minority content and pretending that it is being forced to do so. The MCRI does not apply to private business!

The minority business enterprise as an American OEM auto industry supply “category” has peaked, and is shrinking along with the market share of the American auto industry. The MBE could disappear in the next two years. This will be due to globalization—to foreign owners and partners’ taking over. They would do this only as investment, and will not tolerate money-losing operations. MBE’s are money-losing social-engineering operations, not business decisions based on sound economics. (The auto industry started by trying to help American blacks, and ended up spending billions to avoid being called racists.)

The American OEM auto industry wants its hypocritical MBE racket to die quietly. A grateful government, which has long enjoyed having American business do its job while giving credit to elected officials, will not complain unless they get caught (for instance by RaceFreeZone). Then they will howl that they knew nothing about how the auto industry handled its program to “elevate” minorities by using old-fashioned racism—treating minorities like pets (to paraphrase Shelby Steele).

The auto industry handled the MBE mandates by creating the fronts and the mythology, but it no longer has the financial or personal resources to maintain this fifty-year fiction of creating auto supply businesses without training or educating anyone. A few people got rich on the hopes and dreams of others who never benefited at all.

We at RaceFreeZone do not want the MBE program to die quietly. We believe the death of minority content should be trumpeted far and wide as a victory for free enterprise.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home