[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Black people are smart enough to vote on initiative

Diane Carey brought the op-ed column below, originally published in the Detroit Free Press, to my attention today, and I think all of us need to read and re-read it until the lesson is learned. Diane writes "Dr. Allen is one of Michigan's pre-eminent scholars in his field, and also happens to be black. He takes offense at the assumption that all blacks think and vote in lockstep. So do we."

Published: August 17. 2006 3:00AM
Local columnists
Black people are smart enough to vote on initiative

August 17, 2006


William Allen
Michigan's black voters are under assault in a calculated campaign of deception and disrespect by the group BAMN (By Any Means Necessary) and its political allies (including the Michigan Civil Rights Commission) who oppose the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative.

Using the big lie of "fraud and corruption" in the process of gathering signatures to put MCRI on the Michigan ballot in November, these organizations argue that black voters who signed or would have signed the petition are too dumb and corrupt to have done so knowingly and therefore should not be permitted to participate in the democratic process.

This political campaign is a repeat of historical efforts to deny the civil rights of black citizens.

These efforts mirror exactly the campaign of Hoke Smith for governor of Georgia 100 years ago. Smith began his political career running on the backs of blacks with an enfranchisement campaign. When he concluded that he could not win that way, he ran a campaign on the theme that blacks were too dumb and corrupt to be allowed to participate in the democratic process and therefore should be disfranchised. Smith's creation of a culture of disrespect for blacks led to the Hoke Smith effect -- the culture of violence that led to in the Atlanta pogrom of 1906 in which scores of black citizens were bludgeoned, shot and lynched.

This is a civil rights issue and not just an issue of political and legal maneuvering. The lawsuits against MCRI that allege fraud in signature collection have themselves been built upon fraudulent misrepresentation. Consider the testimony under oath of the Rev. Nathaniel Smith, who was induced by BAMN to testify that he was misled by MCRI contractors to represent the initiative as a civil rights initiative intended to perpetuate affirmative action preferences (squarely contradicting the very language of the initiative).

Smith's testimony is dubious on its face, since he claims to have induced hundreds of black citizens falsely to sign the petition but offered no testimony that he signed it himself. A black man who supposedly believed the initiative was good for black citizens, and so represented it, apparently did not consider that important enough to sign the petition himself.

To the contrary, as my own experience demonstrates, the initiative was honestly presented. It is in fact the case that black citizens, including myself, did sign the petition knowingly. Moreover, many black citizens believe that it deserves to be voted on. Therefore, the legal claims that black citizens could not knowingly wish to hold such a vote is an attempt on the basis of race to deny them the right to vote, against the guarantees of the 15th Amendment.

Citizens who truly desire to defend the participation of black citizens in politics will condemn and resist this means-justifies-the-end approach to politics, based on creating a culture of disrespect for black citizens. Our rights are too valuable to be left vulnerable to the tactics of political radicals.

The mission of our organization, Toward a Fair Michigan, is precisely to defend the democratic process and open, fully informed deliberations. TAFM therefore effectively condemns BAMN and its political allies who seek to undermine the democratic process. TAFM says, "just let us vote."

Dr. WILLIAM ALLEN is a professor of political science at Michigan State University and chairs Toward a Fair Michigan, which supports the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. Write him in care of the Free Press Editorial Page, 600 W. Fort St., Detroit 48226 or

oped@freepress.com.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home