[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Justice Tarnow, an oxymoron

Reader, Norm Hozak, of Midland, Michigan, comments today in the Bay City Times on
the MCRI balot issue decision by Federal U.S. District Judge Arthur Tarnow last week. Any one of you who does not think that judicial appointments are most president's greatest legacy need only to ponder what group of political hacks gave birth to Arthue Tarnow and Anna Diggs Taylor. Jimmy Carter apparently did not grow beyond politics during his presidency.

_________________________________

Voice: Norman Hozak, Midland

After nearly two weeks of deliberation, U.S. District Judge Arthur Tarnow grudgingly ruled that the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI) should be allowed on the November ballot. This ruling reinforces the decisions of every legal authority for the state of Michigan.

After arriving at the only reasonable conclusion, Judge Tarnow could not resist injecting his personal bias. Most distressing was Tarnow's conclusion that fraud was committed when no such proof was established. Tarnow's commentary was nothing more than campaigning from the bench, and the citizens of Michigan should be outraged that a federal judge is so willing to abuse his power.

Tarnow's accusation that ''MCRI targeted all Michigan voters for deception'' is ludicrous. I personally spent many unpaid hours readily collecting signatures on MCRI petitions in 14 Michigan counties. I found that all people easily understood the proposal and were interested in signing based on their personal experience with discrimination in public college admissions or employment.

Hopefully, our democratic form of government will survive the deception and thug tactics of the MCRI opposition. Then the residents of Michigan can take action to help eliminate discrimination by voting ''Yes'' on the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (Proposal 2) on Nov. 7.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home