[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Preservation of Women's Rights under the MCRI

Max McPhail of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative Committee has kindly sent the following talking points memo written by MCRI supporter, Jim Fett, of the Citizans Research Council(http://crcmich.org/PUBLICAT/2000s/2006/rpt343.pdf). Please read the excerptys below carefully, before you fall for the scare tactics of the opposition.



"University Programs - UM has a Women in Science and Engineering (WiSE) program that operates a number of K-12 outreach programs in support of females in science and engineering disciplines. These programs emphasize gender, are targeted to girls, and promote female scientists and engineers, but they do not exclude boys that wish to apply. UM also has a Center for the Education of Women (CEW) which offers free education and employment counseling, among other things. Even though its emphasis is on women, CEW services are available to men as well as women. Based on the language of the proposal, it would appear that these programs could continue as long as they continue to allow male attendance" (Citizens Research Council, 22).


"Athletic Programs - Athletic programs in public education (at the K-12 and
university level) should not be affected by passage of this proposal...Athletic
programs are protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which
states:

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from
participating in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under
any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

Title IX regulations mandate that all schools accepting federal funds must comply
with this legislation" (Citizens Research Council, 25)

"State Employment Trends - By 2001, females earned an average of $0.92 for every
dollar earned by males (this figure was $0.76 in 1977).

Salary parity for minority state employees has historically been high. In 1984,
minorities earned $0.94 for every dollar earned by a non-minority employee; in 2001,
that figure rose to $0.99 for every dollar" (Citizens Research Council 28).

Affirmative Action "If this amendment passes, it will not outlaw all affirmative
action programs in the state. Michigan statutes contain numerous references to
affirmative action and minority status or gender. Only those that grant preferential
treatment to individuals or groups on the basis of minority status or gender would
be invalidated by this amendment" (Citizens Research Council, ii).


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home