[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Sunday, October 01, 2006

DeVos and Bouchard May want to study the MCRI issue more carefully. Their poorly thought out opposition may sink them in the November election

Dick DeVos’ campaign says he can’t be bought and paid for, because his enormous personal wealth puts him beyond such temptation. . It seems that his enormous wealth also insulates him from being sold on a subject that is of vital importance to ordinary people, the same civil rights for everyone regardless of their wealth, race, gender, religion, or social position in their community. DeVos, and to be fair, Bouchard and other politicians who should know better, claim that the MCRI could or may or might have unintended consequences. None of these so-called men of the people seems to care about the intended consequence of the MCRI, taking the state out of the arbitrary preference game for politically favored groups that affirmative action in Michigan has become.

I would like to know exactly what Mr. DeVos and Mr. Bouchard have to say about the following article that appeared in the (University of) Michigan Review (http://www.michiganreview.com/\25/2/issue_1.pdf . The article is a succinct analysis of the deceptive logic used by MCRI opponents.

Why is it that both of the candidates are running against women holding high office? Are they sexists? Don’t they believe in giving failed politicians who are women another chance just because they are women? Perhaps Mr. DeVos anjd Mr. Bouchard need to stand up and be counted for universal civil rights. They certainly don’t seem to believe in the concept now.

1 Comments:

Blogger Timbercake said...

A very interesting article.

I hope DeVos addresses his position on the MCRI in tonight's debate. He is always so wishy-washy on the issues. Well, except when he slipped and came out in favor of teaching intelligent design in science class.

I hope Granholm slams him on the civil rights issue and the fact that DeVos cut thousands of Michigan jobs to open up his Amway shop in China.

10/02/2006 2:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home