[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Sunday, October 15, 2006

The Preference Pie: A Civil Rights Allegory by Diane Carey

THE PREFERENCE PIE


A white boy wants to go to college. He comes from a small city in Michigan.
A white girl also wants to go to college, in the field of finance. She also lives in mid-Michigan with her parents and two brothers.
An adopted Guatemalan boy is growing up in Michigan too. He likes football and video games.
When the white boy applies for college, his application will be pushed aside in preference to the girl. After all, she’s a girl. Girls get extra “favors.” Even though the boy might need help, he won’t get it. He’s white.
But along comes the Hispanic boy. Being brown, he gets more “minority”points, so the white girl gets pushed aside too. Someday when these three want government jobs or contracts, the Hispanic boy will get favors for being brown-skinned, while the girl might get a little extra, but less than the brown boy. The white boy gets left out completely.
Meanwhile, a second girl has appeared. She’s half-black, half-white, which qualifies her as “black.” Since she’s “black” and female, our state government will give her even more “equal opportunity” than the others.
Fantasy? No, this is reality. All these children are in one family . . . mine.
The white boy, the white girl, and the Hispanic boy are my own children. They’re growing up in the same house, but the government is pitting them against each other in the name of “diversity.”
The half-black girl is my niece, and she lives in a $450,000 house. But she’s technically a “black” female, and that trumps everything when pieces of the preference pie are doled out.
Or does it? She has a brother who’s half-black, half-Puerto Rican. Does that make him more “diverse” than his own sister? Will he get an even bigger piece of the pie? Who’s DNA “wins”?
My children and their cousins are not wooden game pieces. They’re individuals. Why would I vote to discriminate against my white son? Why would I vote to give my daughter or my brown son favors they didn’t earn? What kind of mother would I be?
I’m voting YES on Proposal 2, the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative. Race preferences are not “diversity.” They’re just racism with a different-colored hood.

Diane Carey is a Michigan native, a New York Times Bestselling author, columnist, and small-business owner.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home