[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

We won. Now look at the opposition to civil rights for everyone in the light of day.

All of the people of Michigan have won an increase in their civil rights by voting to restore America's constitutional values. This was achieved by what the philosophers of the enlightenment, whose works influenced and guided men such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, called the genius of the people.

The campaign against the MCRI was despicable and directed by white and black elites anxious to preserve their control over complacent black voters. Blinded by their fear of losing power they ignored the facts and sowed fears of illogical consequences. The politicians of both major political parties rejected the expansion of civil rights and adopted fear as their reason for doing so. The idiotic Republican candidate talked about "unintended consequences," and the clueless Democrat incumbent spoke of "consequences." The Republican actually lost the election on this issue, because by embracing the MCRI he would have won.

I, for one, will now stop using hyphens to describe human beings as divided into groups for political purposes especially tribal, religious, or skin-tone groups. In fact I will never again use a hyphen to describe a human being's politics. I start off by officially consigingn so-called descriptive, but actually intended to be divisive, words such as African-American, Black, Negro, and colored to the garbage dump of history, because they are used up and cannot be recycled for any good purpose.

Welcome to the first morning of a Michigan where all people are created equal without the need for hyphens.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home