[Decoder Ring] [Issue Points] [Quotable Quotes] [Myths] [Women and the CRIs: The Facts]

[Jack's Columns] [Diane's Columns] [Reviews] [Links] [Contact Us]

----------

THE (STATE) CIVIL RIGHTS INITIATIVE BALLOT LANGUAGE:

The State shall not discriminate against nor grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

----------

For 2008, Race Free Zone is dedicated to being the no-spin zone of the Civil Rights Initiative movement. This year, we encourage all people, media, and candidates of Arizona, Colorado, and Nebraska to tour the information we have posted here for their consideration as they have the chance to vote on Civil Rights Initiatives in their states this November. We invite all media in the United States to tour this site for facts about this movement. We are strictly fact-oriented. All opinions are clearly shown to be opinions.

The Civil Rights Initiatives are anti-race preference and anti-gender preference ballot initiatives. This all started when California passed Proposition 209, eliminating race and gender preferences in state government, including universities and colleges supported by the state, state employment, and state contracting. The surprising success of this proposal spurred the people of Washington State to do the same, and in 2006 Michigan became the third state to stop the destructive habit of using race and gender preferences in its state education, employment and contracting.

Because of passage in those three states, 25% of the United States' citizens live in non-preference/non-discrimination states.

Below you will find our FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. We invite all questions and any challenge to the answers. Challenges that turn out to be true will be immediately accepted and put up front. We hide nothing. We are fact-based. All postings have been researched, and are cited.

Race Free Zone is constructed to be of use to media, campaigners, debaters, petition circulators, candidates, and to any citizen who wants clear answers and facts.

----------

Why are these initiatives called "civil rights" initiatives?

Don't we already have this?

Are there "hidden consequences"?

Will gender-specific programs be eliminated?

Are gender-specific college sports "endangered"?

Will the Civil Rights Initiatives "threaten" or "put at risk" women's health, breast cancer screenings, shelters, domestic violence programs or gender-specific health programs funded by the state?

Is the language "deceptive"?

Do women make only 70% of men's incomes?

Are the circulators paid?

Are "outsiders" invading your state?

Who's on their side? Who's on our side?

Has affirmative action in college admissions actually resulted in a higher FAILURE rate for minority-student graduation?

Are women incompetent or is the State government sexist?

Why would a mother of a multi-race family be in favor of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative?

Is America more racist now than in the past?

Is it true that multi-millionaire immigrants and wealthy Americans are getting affirmative action set-asides for "disadvantaged minorities"?

Did Ward Connerly "bless" the KKK?

----------

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Affirmative action challenge dead, but, unfortunately, BAMN still lives

BAMN has been "BOOZLED" yet again. By any means necessary (BAMN) apparently means without any thought or logic at all. If they had challenged the clearly defined implementation date for the constitutional revision prior to the election the challenge back then might have had a hearing, and a court might have found in their favor. The BAMN lawyers don't seem to know when to quit wasting the court's time and our time. Perhaps someone should legally challenge BAMN's right to continue to file frivolous lawsuits, but, of course, that would be an interference with the new right to litigate settled issues endlessly. Michigan had 9 million citizens and 11,000 lawyers in 1972. Today we still have 9 million left (Michigan leads the country in net population flow out-2 people leave Michigan permanently for every 1 who settles here) but we have nearly 40,000 lawyers.

From this morning's Detroit Free Press:

Affirmative action challenge dead
January 20, 2007

BY KRISTEN JORDAN SHAMUS

FREE PRESS EDUCATION WRITER

A federal court battle about whether to let three state universities delay implementation of a voter-approved affirmative action ban in admissions policies appears to be over, with the U.S. Supreme Court declining to hear it Friday.

The Supreme Court's decision ends a debate over whether the University of Michigan, Michigan State University and Wayne State University could delay changing admissions policies for six months. A vote in November banned the use of race or gender in those policies.


U-M officials had said it was going ahead with changes and the other schools said their policies were largely in line with the ban, though each school favored the delay while awaiting legal interpretations.

Several civil rights groups have a federal case challenging the referendum's constitutionality. And another lawsuit is set for a hearing Jan. 31 in Washtenaw County Circuit Court.

Contact KRISTEN JORDAN SHAMUS at 313-222-5997 or kshamus@freepress.com.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home